Sacher? Linzer? Donner? Blitzen? Make mine walnut and keep the coffee coming, chop chop!

I should be working ... well, I was working but I had to stop and share this with you while I was still laughing about it.
If you don't like it when I make fun of the way people fold, spindle, mutilate, and otherwise abuse the English language, now is the time to leave.
If you like to chuckle and/or maybe even learn something, stick around.
So I'm looking over an exhibit to a deposition -- in this case an indignant letter from the president of a company that's about to be sued, written to the lawyer whose client is about to sue said company -- and what to my wondering eye should appear but this priceless sentence:
It appears from your letter that you are not sure what you are asking us to be responsible for, however I thought it well to remind you of the tortes of malicious prosecution and/or abuse of process and request that you and your client act in a rationed and reasoned manner before a determination is made to institute action against blah, blah, blah ...
To quote Captain Hector Barbossa, late of the Black Pearl: "There were a lot of long words in there, missy! We're naught but humble pirates."
Okay ... so much to make fun of, so little time. I'll concentrate on the most egregious crime committed error perpetrated by our outraged would-be counter-litigant -- who, by the way, DID get sued, but clearly for the wrong "rationed reasons."
People. A torte is a cake. You can look it up.
A tort is a civil wrong in law. You can look that up too.
So I do believe it is safe to say that there is no such animal as a cake of malicious prosecution.
And even if there were, to quote Willy Wonka: "Eww! No one would buy it!"
That is all.
I must get back to work. It is painfully obvious that someone has been grievously caked wronged and there are great matters of cake law to be decided in this lawsuit.
Now I'm getting hungry.


Reader Comments (9)
Now I feel I should bake something. You're too funny.
-giggles- Even if the guy is *Spelling Challenged,* he must have access to a Spell Checker. If he's the president of a company, and all.
Gentle hugs,
From this 'Aunt,' who is being 'Sweet Aunt Bridget', for the day.
Back to work, ye scurvy pirate!
If you ever ate my mother's cooking, you would understand how a cake may have a attributes of malicious persecution.
Ack, I meant to say "the attributes"!
Gotta watch out for those malicious desserts! They'll get you every time, correctamundo?
Love text messages? Do we even want to know? Spam alert!!!!!
Errors like these make me laugh. People don't seem to realize that seemlingly innocent spelling/grammar errors are usually SERIOUSLY detrimental to their case. Resumes are my favorite...
Oh I knew "tort" vs "torte", but read right over it.
There are long winded lawyers and those that are precise and brief. I've worked for both and all in between. Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., head of the firm could say everything he wanted to say in just a few sentences. I love that. I worked for him for 5 years. Jon McCalla on the other hand, was so long winded no one wanted to work for him. He's now a sixth circuit judge I think. Oh my. I only had to work for him occasionally.